Cancel

Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

Acts 11:1–3

“Now the apostles and the brothers who were throughout Judea heard that the Gentiles also had received the word of God. So when Peter went up to Jerusalem, the circumcision party criticized him, saying, ‘You went to uncircumcised men and ate with them.’”

Even though the Jewish Scriptures—the Old Testament—foresaw a day when the gentiles would be brought into the people of God (Isa. 66:18–21; Mic. 4:1–5), many early Jewish Christians had some trouble with accepting gentiles as part of the fold of Christ. We see this in today’s passage, which records initial responses in the church to the conversion of the gentiles.

Not long after Cornelius and his friends and family came to faith in Jesus, news that the gentiles had believed the gospel spread throughout Judea (Acts 11:1). So when Peter went to Jerusalem, he faced criticism from the “circumcision party” (v. 2). This may not be the best translation, for Peter’s critics were likely not some kind of group that came together in a considered theological opposition to Peter. The same word translated “circumcision party” is used in Acts 10:45 simply for Jews who believed in Jesus. Likely, Peter’s critics were various Jewish Christians and not an organized body.

Why did they criticize Peter? Because he “went to uncircumcised men and ate with them” (11:3). We have noted in earlier studies that many first-century Jews avoided close contact with gentiles because they were trying to avoid the possibility of ceremonial defilement. The various Jewish parties disagreed on how much contact was allowable, but almost all of them saw eating with gentiles as taboo because that would potentially put them in closer proximity to unclean things such as food than would happen if a Jew and a gentile were just passing one another in the street. Peter’s critics were scandalized by his willingness to eat with gentiles before making sure that he would avoid ceremonial defilement.

This attitude is understandable, if not excusable. For many centuries, the Jews had been seeking to maintain ritual purity by avoiding too much contact with gentiles. The Mosaic law did not forbid eating with gentiles, so the Jews’ application of the law was not entirely correct. Still, that misunderstanding shaped their practice considerably. Even Peter was not wholly immune. While Peter ate with Cornelius, Paul would later rebuke him for avoiding table fellowship with gentile Christians at Antioch (Gal. 2:11–14).

Thus, the church in its infancy experienced what we may call “growing pains” as it strove to deal with the incorporation of gentiles into the church. It would take some time before it would become clear what exactly was required of the gentiles.

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

The reluctance of the early Jewish Christians to fellowship fully with gentile believers was driven in part by a misunderstanding and misapplication of the Mosaic law’s statutes regarding ceremonial purity. When Scripture is misunderstood, serious problems in the church can result, which is why we must strive to comprehend God’s Word as accurately as we can.


For further study
  • Zephaniah 3:9–10
  • Romans 14
The bible in a year
  • 2 Kings 1–3
  • John 3:22–36
  • 2 Kings 4–9
  • John 4

The Gentile Pentecost

Our Burden Bearer

Keep Reading Church Planting

From the May 2024 Issue
May 2024 Issue