Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

1 Samuel 17:38–58

“David said to the Philistine, ‘You come to me with a sword and with a spear and with a javelin, but I come to you in the name of the LORD of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom you have defied’ ” (v. 45).

Few Old Testament stories are better known than the story of David and Goliath, wherein a shepherd boy defeated a mighty warrior of the Philistines. But as we see in today’s passage, David won the victory not because of his own strength or skill but because of the presence of the Lord with him.

One of the most important things to note in this story is the contrast between King Saul and David. Remember that the king of Israel was supposed to be a model of faith for the people (Deut. 17:14–20). However, in the encounter with Goliath, Saul proved to be anything but a model of trust in the Lord. No less than the other Israelites, Saul feared Goliath (1 Sam. 17:11). Yet, Saul should have known that it was God’s will to deliver the Israelites from the hand of the Philistines (10:1), so his refusal to act accordingly and fight Goliath himself betrayed his own lack of confidence in the Lord.

David, on the other hand, acted more kingly than the king of Israel. Modeling trust in the Lord, David believed God would deliver him (17:37). In opposing Goliath, David effectively led Israel into battle, which was the king’s job. Moreover, the honor of God’s name was at stake—Goliath had cursed David and David’s Lord (v. 43). When Saul thought preserving his own life was better than confronting the dishonoring of the one true God, David preferred to risk his life lest the sacrilege continue. Saul was a man experienced in battle who would have looked intimidating in his armor. David was but a youth, confronting the giant not with the armor of battle but with a sling and five smooth stones (vv. 38–40). In all this, we see a fulfillment of God’s declaration that in choosing David, our Lord looked at his heart (16:7). David was impressive not because of his stature or weaponry but because he relied on God to rescue him and the rest of Israel.

Goliath appeared intimidating, but David, the man after God’s own heart, knew appearances can be deceiving. Saul feared Goliath on account of the giant’s fierce outward appearance, yet David saw past this to who Goliath really was—an enemy of God and His people, and therefore surely on the losing side (17:41–47). And so, when David launched the stone from his sling (at a speed of up to 150 miles per hour), he knew that God would guide it to bring him victory in that battle (vv. 48–54). But Saul, still judging by appearances, could hardly believe that such a lad could have succeeded.

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

The enemies of God and His people often look intimidating. However, we must look past appearances and realize that Christ will defeat all His and our enemies. No matter how strong the opposition may seem, the church will emerge victorious, for the church is united to Jesus, who is even now putting all of His enemies under His feet (1 Cor. 15:25).

For Further Study
  • 2 Chronicles 20:1–34
  • Psalm 24
  • Colossians 2:15
  • Revelation 20:7–10

The Rise of Protestant Liberalism

David Ascendant

Keep Reading The Nineteenth Century

From the May 2019 Issue
May 2019 Issue