Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

2 Samuel 1:1–16

“David said to him, ‘How is it you were not afraid to put out your hand to destroy the LORD’s anointed?’ ” (v. 14).

When a leader dies, people commonly maneuver to try to attain some benefit from his passing. Whether the person was the leader of an organization or a head of state, individuals who are left behind will jockey for position or otherwise seek to exploit the leader’s death for their advantage. In today’s passage, we read about one man who attempted to advance himself after the death of Saul.

As readers of 1 Samuel 31, we know that Saul committed suicide after being mortally wounded in battle with the Amalekites. David, however, did not know the circumstances of Saul’s death, and we see in 2 Samuel 1:1–10 that an Amalekite came to David, claiming to have finished off Saul at the king’s request and bringing with him the king’s crown and armlet. Clearly this Amalekite was seeking a reward from David, for the distance from Mount Gilboa to Ziklag was some eighty miles and would have taken several days to travel. No doubt the Amalekite knew that David was the logical successor to Saul and believed that David would rejoice in the death of his enemy.

There is much irony in the scene. After all, David had just returned from striking down the Amalekites who had kidnapped the women and children of Ziklag (v. 1; see 1 Sam. 30). So, he would hardly be disposed to look kindly on the Amalekite bearing the news. Also, we have to understand that David probably would have seen through the Amalekite’s story. It would be highly unlikely for Saul to be so isolated in battle that his armor bearer or another Israelite would not be present to end Saul’s life if the king requested it.

The Amalekite gravely misunderstood David’s feelings toward Saul. David, after all, had not held any animosity toward Israel’s first king; the hatred came entirely from Saul. David knew that it was not up to him or any other man to remove Saul from the throne; that was God’s prerogative alone (1 Sam. 24:1–7; 26:1–11). Had the Amalekite actually killed Saul, he would have overstepped his authority, and to lie about it revealed a heart darkened by sin. So, David executed him based on his own testimony of regicide.

Matthew Henry writes that among other things, this episode proves that “to give assistance to any in murdering themselves, directly or indirectly, if done wittingly, incurs the guilt of blood.” David exacted justice in making the Amalekite pay for his professed crime.

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

Lying to achieve a reward or position seldom turns out well. Even if a liar manages to convince someone, the Lord knows the truth and will demand an account for every lie and every careless word. If we are people of the truth, we do not have to fear this judgment. Let us seek always to tell the truth and not to try to manipulate events in an ungodly manner to our own advantage.

For Further Study
  • Deuteronomy 19:15–21
  • Proverbs 19:5
  • Luke 12:1–3
  • Acts 5:1–11

Saul Falls to the Philistines

Lament for Saul and Jonathan

Keep Reading The Nineteenth Century

From the May 2019 Issue
May 2019 Issue