Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

John 7:40–46

“There was a division among the people over him. Some of them wanted to arrest him, but no one laid hands on him” (vv. 43–44).

In our study of the feeding of the five thousand in John 6, we noted how Jesus’ provision of bread led those whom He fed to associate Him with Moses and his work of deliverance. Israel received bread miraculously in the wilderness during Moses’ ministry (Ex. 16), so the people understandably thought something marvelous was going on when Jesus multiplied the loaves and fishes in the wilderness. That first-century Jews were hoping for freedom from Roman occupation contributed to this expectation. Perhaps, they thought, Jesus could be a new Moses-like figure who would liberate them from Rome just as Moses freed them from Egypt.

But that was not the only occasion when the Jews associated Jesus with Moses or his ministry. They also did so just after Jesus proclaimed during the Feast of Booths that He is the source of living water. We see this in today’s passage, where we read that some of the crowd in Jerusalem who heard our Lord’s pronouncement began speculating that He was “the Prophet.” First-century Jews were looking for a new prophet like Moses, based on texts such as Deuteronomy 18:15. Since Moses also gave Israel water through the working of miracles (Ex. 17:1–7; Num. 20:10–13), it was natural that people might think that a new Moses arrived in the person of Jesus, who worked miraculous signs and claimed to be the source of water.

Not everyone agreed with this assessment, however. Others thought that Jesus might be the Christ, that is, the Messiah. (Although we understand that the promised prophet of Deuteronomy 18:15 and the Messiah are the same individual, many first-century Jews saw them as two distinct figures.) But many said otherwise, for they knew that the Messiah had to come from Bethlehem and they saw Jesus only as a Galilean (John 7:41–42; see Micah 5:2–5). John wants us to see irony here. Having written his gospel after the other three gospels were composed, he knew that many in his audience knew that Jesus was in fact born in Bethlehem (Matt. 2:1). The objectors were right that the Christ had to come from Bethlehem; they were wrong that Jesus did not originally hail from that town.

People were divided over whether Jesus was the Prophet, the Messiah, or someone else. Some found His words so disturbing that they wanted to arrest Him (John 7:43–44). But the temple officers could not bring themselves to do so. They saw His evident authority and were afraid to take Him into custody (vv. 45–46).

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

When confronted with the words and deeds of Jesus, no one can finally remain neutral. One will believe Him or reject Him; there is no middle ground. When we proclaim Jesus and His gospel accurately, there will be division. Some will believe and some will refuse to confess Him as Savior. We dare not remake Jesus in our image for the sake of encouraging people to accept Him. They must have Him as He reveals Himself or they will not have Him at all.

For Further Study
  • Exodus 32
  • Joshua 24:14–15
  • Matthew 10:34–39
  • Luke 12:49–53

Rivers of Living Water

The Prophet from Galilee

Keep Reading Hope amid Disappointment

From the May 2018 Issue
May 2018 Issue