Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

Luke 18:1–8

“And will not God give justice to his elect, who cry to him day and night? Will he delay long over them? I tell you, he will give justice to them speedily” (vv. 7–8a).

Proper interpretation of Scripture is absolutely critical for the health of the Christian church. But, as we look at church history, we find that the greatest leaders have not always consistently employed sound interpretative methods. When we look to the church fathers, for example, we marvel at the ways in which they defended the deity of Christ from the Bible. However, we are taken aback by the way in which many of them read the parables of Jesus. Many church fathers used an allegorical method of interpretation whereby they found many layers of meaning in the parables and even said that every specific character in every parable represented some other individual or spiritual trait. The best of the church fathers were restrained in how they used this method, but others drew absurd conclusions based on this hermeneutic (method of interpretation).

Thankfully, our understanding of the parables has matured such that we now recognize that most parables convey one specific point. There are some exceptions, of course. A few parables may teach several points or lessons. The parable of the sower, for example, has at least four points, with each type of soil corresponding to a different way in which the Word of God is received by its hearers (Mark 4:1– 20). But that parable is an unusual case. Most of them emphasize one primary lesson, and the specific details do not usually have an exact correspondence or symbolic relationship to something else.

Take the parable of the unjust judge, also known as the parable of the persistent widow, in Luke 18:1–8. Clearly, the unjust judge does not represent anything beyond himself. He is not a symbol for God, or the devil, or anyone else. Instead, he is a character that Jesus invents in order to develop a comparison that stresses the Lord’s willingness to hear and respond to the prayers of His people. This judge, who in defiance of Deuteronomy 27:19 was not at all concerned to execute justice for widows, finally gives in to the widow’s demands because she refuses to leave him alone until he does. He finally acts justly, not out of a concern to do what is right but simply so that he can have some peace.

If evil judges will act justly in such circumstances, how much more will God, who never tires of hearing the pleas of His people, do what is right? The Lord, who can do no injustice, will move quickly to help when His children cry out to Him (Luke 18:7).

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

We should not think that our infinite God gets tired of hearing our pleas for justice. The Lord does not forget when injustice has been done, and He will certainly rectify it, though sometimes He waits until we have persistently called upon His name before He acts. But whether God intervenes immediately or seems to delay His response, we can be sure that He will do what is right.

For Further Study
  • Psalm 88
  • Mark 7:24–30
  • 1 Thessalonians 5:17
  • Hebrews 13:15
Related Scripture
  • Mark

Beyond the Ceiling

The Parable of the Rich Fool

Keep Reading One Another

From the March 2016 Issue
Mar 2016 Issue