Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

Job 4:7–11

“Remember: who that was innocent ever perished? Or where were the upright cut off?” (v. 7).

For today’s study in the book of Job, we are looking at a portion of the first response by Job’s three friends to his predicament. These three men have been silent since they first appeared on the scene in Job 2:11–13, but with Job’s cursing the day of his birth it seems that their sympathy has run out. Job’s remarks have apparently confirmed their suspicion that Job has brought on his suffering by his sin. For them, it was intolerable that Job should question divine wisdom even implicitly (chap. 3). Thus, Eliphaz jumps right in and asserts that the innocent do not perish and the upright are never cut off (4:7). The implication is clear—if Job were not guilty of transgression, disaster would never have struck him and his family.

While we can sympathize with the intent of Job’s friends to “protect” the Lord from even an implicit questioning of His character, in the end Eliphaz and the others come across as foolish for being so quick to look for guilt in Job. Remember that we have already been told that Job is an upright man who in his initial response to his sufferings “did not sin [or] charge God with wrong” (1:1, 22; 2:10). Obviously, Job’s friends do not have the benefit of the inspired interpretation of Job’s response that we get from the author of the book of Job. Yet that is what makes their statements so foolish. They cannot see the whole picture, but they jump to conclusions anyway. Based on a simplistic view of the moral order, they conclude that since God is righteous, those who are righteous will never experience great suffering and, consequently, that the only reason why anyone suffers is because of specific, personal sin.

God’s Word will not let us have such a naive understanding of life in this fallen world. Even in that portion of Scripture that might lend the most support to the theology of Job’s friends, we find the recognition that death and suffering do not always correspond to specific sin. We are referring to the Pentateuch, specifically the blessings and cursings of God’s law that make it seem as if good behavior in Israel is always rewarded abundantly and sin is always punished with great suffering (Deut. 28). Yet even when the covenant community is obeying the Lord and enjoying blessing, there will still be unexpected deaths (19:4–5). The point is that even under the conditions of covenant obedience, suffering happens because we live in a fallen world. Job’s friends are wrong to see his suffering as conclusive proof of personal sin, and we would be wrong to adopt their view of suffering.

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

The fall has introduced a certain degree of chaos, from our perspective, into this world. Although creation is never chaotic to the Lord and Maker of the universe, the presence of sin means that sometimes people suffer the effects of the fall in ways that are unrelated to their specific, personal sin. While our suffering may be due to a specific sin, this is not always the case, and we should not assume that our pain automatically means that God is displeased with us.

For Further Study
  • Job 21
  • Psalm 73
  • Jeremiah 12
  • 1 Peter 3:18

Job’s First Lament

Understanding God’s Discipline

Keep Reading Thou Shalt: Discovering the Fullness of God's Commands

From the June 2015 Issue
Jun 2015 Issue