Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

Deuteronomy 27:26

“‘Cursed be anyone who does not confirm the words of this law by doing them.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’”

Question and answer 10 of the Heidelberg Catechism needs to be considered again and again in a day and age when even many people within the visible church want to make the love of God incompatible with His righteousness. After all, there is just too much biblical evidence, the catechism tells us, proving that the Lord will not permit “disobedience and rebellion to go unpunished.”

Deuteronomy 27:26 is one proof text for the question’s focus on the righteous wrath of the Lord. In its immediate context, the verse applies to the original Israelites and their accountability to the Mosaic law. By not keeping the commandments, Israel actualized this curse, bringing upon itself the just wrath of God in the form of exile. Banished from the blessed presence of God, covenant-breaking Israel was sent off to places where they would experience desolation (2 Kings 17:7–23; 25:1–21).

Yet as so much of old covenant Israel’s history is typical of greater, more universal realities, the curse on Israel exemplifies what has happened to all mankind in Adam. Israel was like a “new Adam,” given the same task our first parents were given—to multiply and rule over creation and make it submit to God—with the same guarantee of success for obedience (Gen. 1:26–31; 2:4–25; Lev. 26:1–13). It was inevitable that Israel would fail, of course; otherwise, the Lord would not have instituted a sacrificial system to atone for sin. Thus, God never intended for the Israelites to save themselves by keeping the Mosaic law. Still, it is one thing to fail and seek God’s forgiveness and grace, which is what true old covenant believers did, and quite another thing to fail so miserably as to be blind to sin and to think the Lord owes us something. This is what the nation of Israel, considered as a whole, did. In so doing, Israel repeated the sin of Adam, who was blind to his own guilt, blaming Eve for his sin and thinking that the Lord owed him something better than “the woman” given to him (Gen. 3:11–12).

Israel’s fall, as a repetition of Adam’s fall, is yet one more proof of our desperate plight before a holy God. The Israelites’ fall and curse points to our fall and curse, proving that the only Adam who can undo what the first Adam did is not the “new Adam” of Israel but the “last Adam”—Jesus Christ (1 Cor. 15:45).

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

Sometimes we call Jesus the “second Adam,” but it is actually more appropriate to see Him as the “last Adam,” for there are others between Adam and Christ who, in various ways, symbolize that first Adam in their sins. The “last Adam,” however, undid the curse, providing a way for God’s righteous wrath on wickedness to be fulfilled while also extending the grace of salvation to His people. Let us thank Him for His great mercy.

For Further Study
  • Jeremiah 17:5
  • Matthew 25:31–46
  • 1 Corinthians 15:22
  • Galatians 3:10

    The Justice of God

    Man: The Supreme Paradox

    Keep Reading The Apocalypse of John

    From the January 2012 Issue
    Jan 2012 Issue