Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

Ephesians 2:19–20

“You are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets” (vv. 19–20).  

The Gnostic emphasis on salvation by means of a special, mystical knowledge meant that sacred Scripture would either have to be changed (as in the case of Marcion) or ignored altogether. Otherwise, it would be hard for Gnostic teachers to gain ground in the church, so different was their teaching from the truths laid forth in the Bible.

During the second century, the church was gifted with a masterful defender of biblical authority — Irenaeus, bishop of Lyons (located in present-day France). In his work Against Heresies, Irenaeus confronts the teachings of Gnosticism, appealing to apostolic tradition as the final arbiter of truth.

When we speak of apostolic tradition we are not using the term tradition to denote something that is independent of Scripture. According to biblical categories, the word tradition simply refers to something that has been handed over. For Irenaeus, tradition is simply that which has been given to the apostles and through them given to us, that is, nothing less than the Bible itself.

Gnostics appealed to hidden, unwritten teachings from the apostles for their teachings. Irenaeus countered that these do not exist because the bishops knew of no such secret sayings of Jesus or His disciples. If anyone would know of these, it would be the bishops — the successors of the apostles. Irenaeus’ argument did not rule out the possibility that there could be unwritten teachings passed on from apostles to bishops, and, unfortunately, the medieval church later developed an idea of tradition that said infallible teachings can be found also in the magisterium, the teaching office of the church. But this idea was foreign to Irenaeus, and we must keep his context in mind: he was fighting Gnostic heresy and rightly leaned on the succession of apostolic tradition.

Irenaeus is clear that this apostolic tradition is the final arbiter of truth in the church. It is impossible, he said, to appeal to some secret words of Jesus at the expense of the inscribed apostolic word, because to deny the apostles is to deny the Lord who sent them. The words of the apostles and prophets are Christ’s words and the very foundation of the church (Eph. 2:19–20).

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

Today’s passage is very important for our doctrine of Scripture. If the prophets and apostles are the foundation of the church, then their writings are the final court of appeal for belief and practice. We should also not expect new revelation from God because once the foundation is laid there is no need to build it again. How do you evaluate your thoughts and beliefs? God’s Word alone can determine what we believe about Him.

For Further Study
  • Numbers 27:12–23
  • 1 Kings 19
  • 1 Timothy 6:20
  • 2 Timothy 2:1–2
Related Scripture

Marcion’s Challenge

Augustine’s View of Man

Keep Reading Resolved to Press On Toward the Goal

From the January 2009 Issue
Jan 2009 Issue