Cancel

Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

2 Corinthians 5:17–21

For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him (2 Cor. 5:21).

The Reformers believed that Scripture taught a significantly different view of justification than that promulgated by the Roman Catholic Church. The Roman church said that God declares a person just after he has been baptized and the righteousness of Christ has been infused into his soul. In other words, when God evaluates a person, He does not declare him just unless He actually finds righteousness in him. His justification must be true by definition.

Martin Luther, John Calvin, and the other Reformers, of course, insisted that justification is solely by faith, which led to the Reformation slogan sola fide (“by faith alone”). Their view has been called “forensic justification.” The word forensic is used in both legal matters and to describe types of oratory, the making of declarations. Therefore, the Reformed view is that justification occurs when God makes a legal pronouncement, declaring a person to be righteous in His sight. And what is the basis for this declaration? Simply put, it is the righteousness of Christ. Whereas the Roman Catholics said God infuses Jesus’ righteousness into a person’s soul, rendering him actually righteous, the Protestants said that God imputes Jesus’ righteousness to a person. This, too, is a legal maneuver—God credits the righteousness of Christ to the “account” of the sinner, with the result that, when God studies the sinner’s record, He finds only righteousness (the sins of the person having been imputed to Christ and punished on the cross).

The Reformed view of justification never declares that the sinner is actually righteous. Though he is now declared righteous, he remains sinful. That led Luther to describe justified sinners as simul justus et peccator, a Latin phrase meaning “at the same time just and sinner.” At first glance, this sounds like a contradiction. However, a contradiction occurs when we say something is what it is and also that it is something else at the same time and in the same relationship. But justified sinners are not just and sinners at the same time and in the same relationship. They are just in one sense (legally) and sinners in another (actually). Luther’s point, which meant so much to him personally, is that sinners do not have to wait until they achieve actual righteousness before God will accept them in His sight as justified.

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

The Roman Catholic Church says that forensic justification is a “legal fiction” that casts a shadow on God’s integrity. Not so—as we have seen in Romans, God sent Jesus to die on the cross that He might remain “just and the justifier.” Thank Him once more today that you stand as righteous in His sight because of the obedience of Christ.


For Further Study
  • Acts 13:38–39
  • 1 Corinthians 1:30–31
  • Galatians 2:16
  • Philippians 3:9

    Actual Righteousness?

    Analytical and Synthetic

    Keep Reading The Many Facets of the Fisherman

    From the March 2002 Issue
    Mar 2002 Issue