Cancel

Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?
Loading the Audio Player...

Judges 21:5–9

“And the children of Israel grieved for Benjamin their brother, and ‘One tribe is cut off from Israel today. What shall we do for wives for those who remain?’” (Judg. 21:6–7a)

As we saw in yesterday’s study, the Israelites swore two oaths as they planned their response to the sin of the men of Gibeah. The oaths grew out of their sincere desire to react in righteousness to the Benjamites’ refusal to repent, and both had support from the Mosaic Law. However, the people may have gone too far in fulfilling the first oath—to kill everyone who did not come to the national assembly—with the result that the tribe of Benjamin is nearly extinct. Now they are sorrowful for their actions and the results, and desire to find a way to repair the damage. But the second oath rules out the simplest solution—they cannot give their own daughters to the surviving Benjamites as wives. Like Jephthah (Judg. 11:35), the Israelites realize they are boxed in by the words of their mouths. Thus, their search for a solution begins to devolve into a search for a way around their vows.

Imagine that we are Israelites listening to the debate about what to do for the Benjamites. Some in the crowd begin to ask whether there is anyone in Israel who is not bound by either oath. “ ‘What one is there from the tribes of Israel who did not come up to Mizpah, to the Lord?’ ” they ask. When the roll of those who attended the assembly is checked, it is found that no one was there from the city of Jabesh Gilead, on the east side of the Jordan. “Perhaps there is an opportunity here,” some say excitedly. “This means the men of Jabesh Gilead are free to allow their daughters to marry Benjamites!” But that sparks a quick reaction from others. “Not so fast,” they say. “Jabesh is under the first oath. Since no one from that town bothered to come, we’re morally obligated to destroy it. That’s what we said we would do.” (At this point, some probably speak up to urge that the Benjamites be finished off, but virtually no one wants to hear that.)

It is easy to speculate that the eventual course of action decided by the assembly is a compromise that fully satisfies no one. However, we must remember the point the author of Judges is making in all this. These things occur because “there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.” There is no one who both knows the revealed will of God for Israel and possesses the authority to lead the people to do it. The results, as we will see tomorrow, are predictably sad and ethically questionable.

Coram Deo Living before the face of God

Have you ever been “trapped” by your words? Did you follow through on what you had said you would do, or were you forced to change course because you saw that what you had pledged to do was an improper route? Read and meditate on the verses below, and begin to pray that God will help you place tight reins on your tongue.


For Further Study
  • Psalm 39:1
  • Matthew 12:36
  • Titus 1:10
  • James 1:26
  • James 3:2
  • 1 John 3:18

    Sorrow Over Victory

    Funerals and Weddings

    Keep Reading The Agony and the Ecstasy: The Acts of Christ in the First Century

    From the December 2001 Issue
    Dec 2001 Issue