Tabletalk Subscription
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining.You've accessed all your free articles.
Unlock the Archives for Free

Request your free, three-month trial to Tabletalk magazine. You’ll receive the print issue monthly and gain immediate digital access to decades of archives. This trial is risk-free. No credit card required.

Try Tabletalk Now

Already receive Tabletalk magazine every month?

Verify your email address to gain unlimited access.

{{ error }}Need help?

When Jesus said that He came for the sick, not the healthy, one of the great implications was that His gospel is a gospel of hope. The healthy tend to take it all for granted—as it was yesterday, so it will be tomorrow. Thus, as far as their condition is concerned, they hope for nothing. As Paul put it in another context, who hopes for what he already has? The sick, by contrast, usually fall into one of two categories—hopeful of recovery or despairing. Still, our natural tendency is in the direction of hope. If the disease is a minor ailment, the tendency is to be hopeful without thinking. And even if it is terminal, we almost have to be battered into accepting the truth. We want to be hopeful whether we have grounds for hope or not.

However, the human condition being what it is, the nature of the case requires intelligent despair. Man is born to trouble as the sparks fly upward (Job 5:7). The trouble is not imposed on us from without; we are all conceived in sin. And so, when Jesus said He came for the sick, He was not trying to flatter us in our natural tendency to groundless hope. He did intend for those who call upon Him to move from despair to hope. But in order for this to happen, they first must move from groundless hope to despair.

Jesus taught us that the one who is forgiven little loves little, and the one who is forgiven much loves much. We may apply the same principle to hope. The one who has a little sickness can hope only for a little recovery. But the law of God is a battery of diagnostic tests that tells us how awful our condition actually is. Imagine going into a hospital for the soul and inviting the staff to run every test imaginable—spiritual blood work, MRIs, X-rays, the works. Imagine further that omni-competent angelic technicians are running the show, recalling that the law was delivered to us through angels. This is what the law of God does. It detects everything—the slightest stirring of lust, the first few cancer cells of envy, the leprosy of vainglory, the pustules of pride, which we think are beauty marks. And the report always comes back to us in the words of God to Abimelech: “ ‘Behold, you are a dead man’ ” (Gen. 20:3, NASB).

Whenever a man has a terminal disease, he naturally wants to know whether there is a remedy. But this is where our case varies from the illustration. In the physical world, we can understand a man refusing treatment if it would cost too much and would bankrupt his heirs, or if the treatment would be too painful. But what would we make of a man who had a terminal disease and refused to take the medicine because he did not like the taste or smell of it? This would be just another way for him to maintain that he really was not sick to the point of death. Scripture teaches us that the gospel is the aroma of life to those who are being saved, but it is the aroma of death to those who are perishing.

The law of God is a battery of diagnostic tests that tells us how awful our condition actually is.

This gives us two categories of men—those who are perishing and those who are perishing. In the first category, they are being saved from perishing. In the second, they are simply perishing, and the medicine smells foul to them. This illustrates why God is not seeking any volunteers to take the medicine—no one would volunteer. To extend the illustration, the medicine is really a lifelong course of treatments, and the first treatment is essential to make us willing to take the rest of it. So God makes the decision to begin the treatments apart from us, and makes us willing in the day of His power. Therefore, it is not of him who wills or of him who runs to the pharmacy.

Once God begins the treatments, three things are born in the heart of the patient—faith, hope, and love. The greatest is, of course, love, but Paul did not mean for us to consider the other two as insignificant. Hope is born in us, hope that we one day will be fully conformed to the image of the Lord Jesus. God is in the process of building up a new man out of the ruins of the old Adam. This new man is the Lord Jesus, and we are being built up into Him, the true image of God.

Wonderfully, our hope in this final goal is one of the instruments God uses to accomplish it. This hope does not disappoint us—we are predestined to be conformed to the image of God’s Son. In love He predestined us to complete recovery.

But hope, like the other virtues, requires an object. This process will not happen simply by our efforts to inculcate a vague, undirected feeling of hopefulness. Hope is directed to the object of hope, the resurrection of all the faithful in Christ, and the more it is directed there, the more the hope grows. The more it grows, the more clearly it can see the object of hope. This is why hope is so clear-sighted, in both directions. Despair has a sense of the size and power of our spiritual affliction, but only hope understands its nature. Presumption knows that the resurrection is good, but only hope understands the depth of the glory. This is why hope understands both what we have been delivered from and where we are being taken.

The Puritan Hope

A Hope That Shall Hold

Keep Reading The Light of Hope

From the May 2002 Issue
May 2002 Issue